Archeologists agree that “the spatial
division of cities into residential zones is a universal feature of urban life
from the earliest cities to the present” (Smith 2010). Yet,
ubiquitous and longstanding though they may be, city-centered research on
“urban Christians” has thus far paid little attention to neighborhoods. A
neighborhood-focused analysis of the communication of early Christ religion
within imperial cities is a most recent analytical enterprise. House-based
descriptions have been largely preferred and taken as though they can tell the
whole truth about the city life of Jesus followers and, eventually, the
“citification” of their cult. As is often the case, the prolific writer Tertullian comes to the
rescue: in a fleeting passage of his Apology,
he states that, when it comes to “benevolence” and “good actions”, “we
Christians, are the same to the Emperors as we are to our neighbors (Idem sumus imperatoribus qui et vicinis
nostris)”. Good deeds Christians did and/or claimed to do for emperors are
well known (payment of taxes, military enlistment, prayers, sometimes even
sacrifices). What about the neighbors? What can we know about what a Jesus
follower did for her/his vicinis? Introducing some contextualizing snapshots of neighborhood issues and explaining the potential of a neighborhood-scaled analysis
conducted with an Urban Religion approach, this paper’s aim is to probe how material evidence from Greco-Roman urban environments and literary texts produced
by Jesus followers have been critically surveyed in order to sharpen or
question the knowledge on early Christ religion as viewed from a street-level
perspective. Some final notes will show the extent to which our “sources” can
be further surveyed in order to shed more light on this crucial aspect of an
urban religion and eventually answer the following question: how did the need to establish neighborly neighboring relationships in densely populated urban districts affect Christ
religion and its self-representation?
No comments:
Post a Comment