Friday, 20 October 2017

Felipe Torres gives a working paper on "Conceptualize Future(s). Utopia and Acceleration"

Is there a relation between Utopia and Acceleration? And both of them with the future? How we can think the modern notion of utopia related with a notion of acceleration? Are they in fact linked with a conception of future?
As it is well-known the Geschichtliche Grundbegriffe is a project particularly focused into define the fundamental concepts of Modernity. Two of these concepts identified by Reinhart Koselleck are Utopia and Acceleration. In simply terms Utopia is a crucial concept in at least 3 levels: a) political because it is the emergence of a new world possible, b) historical in terms of speech that must be oriented to the History in the future (not the past as in the Historia magistrae vitae); and c) temporal because all this concluding in an increasing of speed in order to reach a World conception similar to the utopia, that creates conditions for that some scholars have called acceleration (Virilio 2012; Rosa 2013; Avenessian & Mackay 2014). On the other hand, acceleration is understood by Koselleck as consequence progressive increases of frequencies of change. In this sense acceleration is related with structural conditions of modern history.
In this respect, there are a group of several writings in which Reinhart Koselleck (2002; 2006; 2012) describes the main characters of the utopia and acceleration separately as crucial concepts of Modern Times. The utopia it is described as a projection of new and better society inside the future. Meanwhile acceleration is understanding as progressive increase of frequencies of change, results in a temporalization of the history, particularly in a futurization one. At this point emerges the first point of convergence between them: both utopia and acceleration concludes in a futurization of history.
However, Koselleck´s approach has not its focus in the possible mutual implications on these 2 concepts. At least, the relation among them was not attended as principal issue. Following a couple of emblematic texts from conceptual history on this (Hölscher 1999; Koselleck 2006) we propose to explore the relation between the emergency of a utopian conception of the history and the acceleration of different processes as consequence of purposes for a better society(ies) into the future. Believing in a better future that can be reached by precise efforts, utopia promotes a fruitful environment for an acceleration of sociohistorical processes.
Shortly, the hypothesis with we will work is the following: there is no acceleration process possible without a utopian notion, and this have not just severe consequences in compression of History, but in political terms, i.e. as temporalization of promises for better societies on the future (as utopia), but as soon as possible (in terms of acceleration).

No comments:

Post a Comment