At
the international level and in the general public, corruption is
acknowledged, in particular, by the work of Transparency International
(TI). A
major impetus to raise awareness about corruption is the wide range of
empirical research and rankings of corruption indices, which
comparatively assess levels of corruption in the world and publish new
reports every year on the most corrupt countries in the world. The first
index to make headlines worldwide, which is also the best-known case to
date, is the Corruption Perception Index (CPI) that was first published
by TI in 1995 and measures the perception of corruption. In addition,
the Bribe Payers Index (BPI), which is a ranking of the countries whose
companies are willing to pay bribes in developing countries also
appeared in 1999. The Global Corruption Barometer (GCB), which TI has
published since 2006, is intended to provide a more comprehensive
picture of corruption in a large region. Since 1996, the World Bank has
presented the Worldwide Governance Indicators that are measured in six
dimensions.
The sixth dimension named Control of Corruption also measures the
degree of corruption on a global scale. Therefore, there is no shortage
of measurement of corruption and attention to the issue.
However,
the underlying corruption concepts are often relatively out of focus in
public debates, as well as in the respective indices and, hence, remain
rather intuitive and conceptually unclear due to the absence of an
underlying theory.
In
this paper, the corruption concepts used in broadly collected
empirically measured corruption indices are examined from the
perspective of a pragmatist economic ethics, in order to determine how
corrupt action is conceived and what contribution these concepts can
make to the fight against corruption. At the same
time this analysis will also allow us to draw conclusions for
corruption research on the one hand and economic ethics on the other.
To
this end, (section 2), criteria of a pragmatist economic ethics will be
identified and concepts of corruption are to be investigated with their
aid. In the third section four central international corruption indices
will be considered in light of the previously developed criteria. In
the last section (4), a number of conclusions are drawn for a pragmatist
economic ethics of corruption.
No comments:
Post a Comment