This paper attempts to answer the question of what, if anything, have radical
social movements achieved for the poorest. Like most peasants in the Global
South, those supported by radical movements nevertheless landed in the throes of
capitalism, increasingly becoming immiserated wage labour.
Using
the case of two provinces in India that had the presence and absence of a radical
movement respectively, I undertake an examination of how radical social
movements might shape the trajectory of the state and capital, and in turn, impact the
conditions of labour.
Although
both economies under consideration, I argue,
transitioned to capitalist practices, in movement absent areas — small
and
marginal farmers lacking a worker’s organization — remained stuck in
previous
exploitative relations of production. In such areas, any break in labour
conditions came only from random opportunities that arose in the local
economy.
In movement present areas, I find, although new relations of
exploitation
replaced old ones, an organizational structure of protest that had
provided land and wage gains for the peasant class in the past, led to
creating further
contradictions between labour and the capitalists. This resulted in
renewed
protest cycles and an advancement in wage opportunities for the peasant
masses. I conclude with what I see as the
impact of armed social movements in the global south in creating ‘economies of
struggle,’ where collective action organizing pays off in terms of improving peoples’
livelihoods and more significantly, in creating a protest infrastructure that
can and does become deployed more willingly in labour-capital struggles.
No comments:
Post a Comment