This is a revised and expanded version of a lecture that I gave at the Gotha
Forschungszentrum in January. The reason for reviving the paper is that it
addresses central issues discussed in the KFG plenaries preparing for the
end time (cf. the theses from Martin Mulsow and me). The paper is thus not
part of my project on natural law. Nor is it theoretical, or methodological,
in character; rather, it provides a case study of multiple authorial personae,
namely, the work of the Danish polymath Ludvig Holberg (1684-1754). I
show how Holberg uses the techniques of contemporary eclecticism in a
wide variety of works and genres of works. I suggest that this goes along
with an espistemic attitude that is somewhat different from the usual
moderate scepticism often associated with eclecticism. And I indicate how
a many-sided ambiguity about the supposedly ‘real’ author is effected in
order to secure space for a basic, somewhat simplistic but earnest
religiosity without jeopardising the pervasive pluralism. A key factor here
is the ‘creation’ of the audience, including the scholars who nearly three
centuries later pursue the real Holberg. But he, too, is always a persona for
an audience. The conclusion – if any – is that it is a kind of category
mistake to ask what ‘he’ really believed.
No comments:
Post a Comment