The majority of inhabitants of the Roman Empire
lived in villages, living off the agricultural capacities of the land around.
In this, the Roman Western Asian Provinces are not different to other parts of
the Roman Empire. However, even if not based on counted numbers, the density of
religious institutions in and around villages, in the open land between them,
seems to be extremely high in the areas of the Eastern Mediterranean. But why?
What are the religious needs and demands that are reflected in the many
architecturally structured places, the objects offered and in use there? How
regional, then, are certain developments, manifestations and their material
outcomes – how are general trends of the wider Mediterranean / Roman Empire
taken over into a local tradition?
In particular, I look at oracular and healing
services, offered in sacred places along the ridge of the Libanon and on Mount
Hermon as well as in the Syrian steppe – taking this as a point of distinction
of the numerous sacred places.[1] With a choice of several
sanctuaries (Niha, Hosn Niha, Temnine el-Fouqa, Afka, Banias, Baitokaike,
Isriye and Ain el-Fije) whose phases correspond roughly to a Hellenistic
foundation and one or two Roman rebuilding phases (with a peak in the 2nd
c. CE) I revise certain takes on the sanctuaries and their functions by
applying a spatially oriented methodology, and offer new interpretations of how
they were embedded into a social topography in the rural areas of the Lebanon
mountains and Mount Hermon, acknowledging their relatedness to the urban places
like Sidon, Berytus, Tyros, Baalbek, Damascus or Palmyra, as well as their
independent social and spatial position. The consolidation of the Roman
administration in the 2nd c. CE as the political background in the
region as well as the cultural backdrop of the 2nd c. CE in the
wider Mediterranean allows for the questioning their impact on the appearance
and activities reflected in dedications by visitors or neighbours, in
rebuilding measures by religious specialists, or reshaping entire places by
civic authorities.
[1] Other features one could look for to have a closer perspective
are f. e. dedicants and their offerings, relation of elite people to other
agents in the sanctuaries, on the way gods are conceptualised at the sites
etc.pp.
No comments:
Post a Comment