Showing posts with label Justice. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Justice. Show all posts

Wednesday, 6 June 2018

Priyanka Jha gives a working paper on 'The Gaze on Justice: Outlining a Genealogy of Ideas From Anagarika Dharmapala to Dr B R Ambedkar'


 This paper argues that the construction of the notion of justice vary with the way otherness is constructed. It argues for an inclusive notion of justice and shifting from constitutional normative construction of otherness to the construction of otherness within the civilizational ethical-existential values of Kshama (forgiveness), Karuna (compassion) and Atma Gyan (knowledge of spiritual self) drawn from Buddhism.

Drawing on the feminist discussion on ‘subtle invisibilization as injustice’ it is argued that the diverse epistemes present in the critical vernaculars and the colloquial traditions within India, that have been invisibilised by dominant discourse need to made available for a political discourse on justice.

It bring on board the works of four thinkers Anagarika Dharmapala (1873-1933), Dharmanand Kosambi(1876-1947), Ananda K Coomaraswamy (1877-1947) and Rahul Sankrityayan (1893-1963) all who dynamically drew from Buddhism in the late 19th Century and early 20th Century. They initiated the discourse of dignity and self worth based through the life and teaching of the Buddha, invoked as an Exemplar. This discourse preceded Navayana Buddhism as espoused by Dr B R Ambedkar.

These responses were invisibilised as ‘revivalist’ by the oriental and nationalist discourse. The category revivalist positioned Buddhism within the limits of historical time. When in fact it was concerned with the ‘return’ of ethical-existential values to guide a nation cleavaged and marred with inequalities and injustices within civilizational/ discursive formation. These thinkers worked extensively in bringing to the masses the different hues of Buddhism and its varied interpretations.

This has been done with the history of ideas methodology which attempts an overcoming invisibilisation, move beyond the western imagination and emerge out of the frames of oriental. This has been undertaken to clear the ground for discussion on a different idea of India

  
Biographical Details:
Priyanka teaches Political science in School of Undergraduate Studies at Ambedkar University in Delhi. She is presently a Junior fellow at the Max Weber Centre of Advanced Cultural and Social Studies, University of Erfurt, Germany as part of “Religious Individualisation in historical perspective’ whereby she is working on Buddhism and making of idea of India. She is interested in doing history of ideas and  Political thought and theory.


Thursday, 10 May 2018

Petra Gümplová is going to present a working paper on 'Popular Sovereignty over Natural Resources'

The article Popular Sovereignty over Natural Resources discusses the concept of popular sovereignty over natural resources and its possible applicability to a broader account of natural resource justice based on a moral interpretation of international law. Leif Wenar’s recent proposal to entrench popular resource sovereignty as a counterclaim to illegitimate uses of natural resources by corrupt and authoritarian regimes serves as the starting point for the discussion of the possible meaning of popular resource sovereignty and its role in an account of natural resource justice. Three key aspects of Wenar’s conception are in focus: 1) the framing of popular resource sovereignty within the current system of sovereign territoriality, 2) the notion of collective ownership of natural resources as the content of popular resource sovereignty, and 3) civil and political rights as the key set of norms determining the conditions of legitimate exercise of resource sovereignty. The article argues that collective sovereignty claims over natural resources can neither be framed exclusively through boundaries of current sovereign states, nor understood in terms of full and unlimited property rights. Concerning civil and political rights, I argue we need to move past the liberal conception of legitimacy toward a more comprehensive human rights-based conception of justice serving as a standard for assessment of legitimacy of both sovereign and non-sovereign entities which have rights over natural resources.

Tuesday, 16 May 2017

Beatrice Renzi is going to present a working paper on 'Intersectional perspectives on Dalit women and justice: Exploring the systemic interlinkages between patriarchy, caste and class'

The paper takes stock of present day conditions involving violence against Dalit women. It strives to unpack the many normative systems shaping Dalit women’s social positionalities and their lived realities of justice. The analysis is focused on gaining an understanding of the ordinary every-day context within which systemic violence and its normative frames of reference are inscribed. By positioning the field of investigation at the intersection between questions of gender, caste and class entangled within locally contextual dynamics of power, the paper aims to illustrate how the understanding of violence and justice changes if it is viewed from Dalit women perspectives and how this view alters our assessment of the potentials and constraints facing democratic institutions and the rule of law in contemporary India. This also represents a methodological choice which seeks to highlight how a seemingly liminal analytical perspective becomes central in illuminating some of the pivotal junctures that help to explain the workings of a system as a whole.