Background of the paper
This paper is a first draft of a contribution to an edited volume titled Dividualizing
the Self. The volume will also be an outcome of the work of the research group
‘Religious Individualization in Historical Perspective’, but intends to reverse and
complement its focus on ‘individualization’. While most KFG-studies give evidence
of individualization as a historically and geographically broad phenomenon, thus
challenging standard theories of modernization, which regard (religious)
individualization as a specific (early) modern and essentially Western or Christian
phenomenon, the planned volume will contest the modernization narrative from a
different angle. Taking up idea and concept of ‘dividuality’, extensively explored in
anthropological literature, the volume aims to prove the relevance of the ‘dividual’
person also in western and non-western historical, early modern and modern
contexts. ‘Dividuality’ will be used in the planned volume as an umbrella term,
which allows to perceive the Self / the person as ‘open’ and ‘divisible’. Instead of
constructing the Self /the person as a bounded, indivisible, possessive and
autonomous entity, it highlights its relational qualities, thereby taking into account
not only other persons, but also things / objects and ‘not unquestionably plausible’
agents/authorities (the transcendent, divine).
Character of the paper
This paper is highly explorative and moves between different disciplines, fully
aware about possible risks of (mis)interpretation. Before publication this paper will
undergo several rounds of discussion and revision, and will be presented at the
final conference (Abschlusskonferenz of the KFG. Comments and suggestions are
therefore greatly appreciated.
Abstract:
The paper makes an attempt to use the idea of dividuality, which brings the permeability, relationality and openness of an individual person into focus, to understand the human capacity to show empathy and compassion, and display vulnerability in the face of violence, suffering and death. My starting point is the anthropology of violence and pain, but to further pursue my argument I take up the concept of sympathy in selected philosophical texts from the 18th century, reflect on the differences between empathy and identification, explore empathy as resonance and finally, focus on the relation between autonomy, vulnerability and empathy.
Abstract:
The paper makes an attempt to use the idea of dividuality, which brings the permeability, relationality and openness of an individual person into focus, to understand the human capacity to show empathy and compassion, and display vulnerability in the face of violence, suffering and death. My starting point is the anthropology of violence and pain, but to further pursue my argument I take up the concept of sympathy in selected philosophical texts from the 18th century, reflect on the differences between empathy and identification, explore empathy as resonance and finally, focus on the relation between autonomy, vulnerability and empathy.
No comments:
Post a Comment