During the second half of the 20th Century several US-American social
science „disaster research groups“ conducted field studies after
earthquakes, factory explosions and “racial riots”. Their aim was to provide
practical knowledge that could be applied in the planning and managing of
future disasters of both peace- and wartime nature. In this paper, I will
elaborate on how this research goal conflicted with some scientists’
aspirations to develop more theoretical knowledge, and how, more
generally, it endangered disaster research’s “scientificity”. I will also show
how the generated research results came to be ‘impractical knowledge’,
which was difficult or impossible to apply. Furthermore this paper analyzes
the scientific practices that were involved at different stages of the
knowledge production process and contributed to disaster research’s
‘precarious’ character.
No comments:
Post a Comment