Friday, 20 October 2017

Felipe Torres gives a working paper on "Conceptualize Future(s). Utopia and Acceleration"

Is there a relation between Utopia and Acceleration? And both of them with the future? How we can think the modern notion of utopia related with a notion of acceleration? Are they in fact linked with a conception of future?
As it is well-known the Geschichtliche Grundbegriffe is a project particularly focused into define the fundamental concepts of Modernity. Two of these concepts identified by Reinhart Koselleck are Utopia and Acceleration. In simply terms Utopia is a crucial concept in at least 3 levels: a) political because it is the emergence of a new world possible, b) historical in terms of speech that must be oriented to the History in the future (not the past as in the Historia magistrae vitae); and c) temporal because all this concluding in an increasing of speed in order to reach a World conception similar to the utopia, that creates conditions for that some scholars have called acceleration (Virilio 2012; Rosa 2013; Avenessian & Mackay 2014). On the other hand, acceleration is understood by Koselleck as consequence progressive increases of frequencies of change. In this sense acceleration is related with structural conditions of modern history.
In this respect, there are a group of several writings in which Reinhart Koselleck (2002; 2006; 2012) describes the main characters of the utopia and acceleration separately as crucial concepts of Modern Times. The utopia it is described as a projection of new and better society inside the future. Meanwhile acceleration is understanding as progressive increase of frequencies of change, results in a temporalization of the history, particularly in a futurization one. At this point emerges the first point of convergence between them: both utopia and acceleration concludes in a futurization of history.
However, Koselleck´s approach has not its focus in the possible mutual implications on these 2 concepts. At least, the relation among them was not attended as principal issue. Following a couple of emblematic texts from conceptual history on this (Hölscher 1999; Koselleck 2006) we propose to explore the relation between the emergency of a utopian conception of the history and the acceleration of different processes as consequence of purposes for a better society(ies) into the future. Believing in a better future that can be reached by precise efforts, utopia promotes a fruitful environment for an acceleration of sociohistorical processes.
Shortly, the hypothesis with we will work is the following: there is no acceleration process possible without a utopian notion, and this have not just severe consequences in compression of History, but in political terms, i.e. as temporalization of promises for better societies on the future (as utopia), but as soon as possible (in terms of acceleration).

Sunday, 15 October 2017

Bettina Hollstein gives a working paper on "Corruption indices in the light of pragmatist ethics"

At the international level and in the general public, corruption is acknowledged, in particular, by the work of Transparency International (TI). A major impetus to raise awareness about corruption is the wide range of empirical research and rankings of corruption indices, which comparatively assess levels of corruption in the world and publish new reports every year on the most corrupt countries in the world. The first index to make headlines worldwide, which is also the best-known case to date, is the Corruption Perception Index (CPI) that was first published by TI in 1995 and measures the perception of corruption. In addition, the Bribe Payers Index (BPI), which is a ranking of the countries whose companies are willing to pay bribes in developing countries also appeared in 1999. The Global Corruption Barometer (GCB), which TI has published since 2006, is intended to provide a more comprehensive picture of corruption in a large region. Since 1996, the World Bank has presented the Worldwide Governance Indicators that are measured in six dimensions. The sixth dimension named Control of Corruption also measures the degree of corruption on a global scale. Therefore, there is no shortage of measurement of corruption and attention to the issue.
However, the underlying corruption concepts are often relatively out of focus in public debates, as well as in the respective indices and, hence, remain rather intuitive and conceptually unclear due to the absence of an underlying theory.
In this paper, the corruption concepts used in broadly collected empirically measured corruption indices are examined from the perspective of a pragmatist economic ethics, in order to determine how corrupt action is conceived and what contribution these concepts can make to the fight against corruption.  At the same time this analysis will also allow us to draw conclusions for corruption research on the one hand and economic ethics on the other.
To this end, (section 2), criteria of a pragmatist economic ethics will be identified and concepts of corruption are to be investigated with their aid. In the third section four central international corruption indices will be considered in light of the previously developed criteria. In the last section (4), a number of conclusions are drawn for a pragmatist economic ethics of corruption.

Kathi Beier presents a working paper on "Human virtue—the measure of all virtue?"

In his ethical writings, Aristotle establishes a strong link between a substance's peculiar work or "function" (ergon) and its virtue (arete). But what does ergon mean exactly? And how are we to understand, in turn, the concept of virtue? The aim of the paper is to offer some evidence to suggest that Aristotle, unlike Plato, does not maintain a functionlist conception of virtue. Rather, he defines virtue psychologically and he argues in anthropocentric terms. This means that there is reason to believe Aristotle defines virtue with respect to human virtue, and that he takes other kinds of virtue, for example, the virtues of the horse, to be virtues by analogy. Therefore, the paper (i) rejects the functionalist reading of Aristotelian virtue and, thereby, (ii) naturalistic and culturalistic approaches to modern virtue ethics that read Aristotle in functional terms, and (iii) reflects on the question whether, for Aristotle, human virtue is the measure of all virtue.

Sunday, 24 September 2017

"Resonant Self–World Relations in Ancient and Modern Socio-Religious Practices" - introductory videos

The new International Graduate School Erfurt-Graz on

 "Resonant Self–World Relations in Ancient and Modern Socio-Religious Practices"

has produced 10 exciting introductory videos which speaks to you to invite you to join our work.












While the infrastructure is now being secured through two generous grants by the BMBF and the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft and the Austrian Science Foundation, we are looking to attract further grant resources to foster the research in this stimulating research field.

Friday, 15 September 2017

Christoph Hennings latest Article has been published

Christoph Hennings latest article has been published in the "Neue Zürcher Zeitung": "<Das Kapital> ist ein Klassiker mit trauriger Aktualität"

The online version of the is available here:
https://www.nzz.ch/wirtschaft/das-kapital-ist-ein-klassiker-mit-trauriger-aktualitaet-ld.1316168

Monday, 4 September 2017

Call for Applications - MWK Fellows

 COFUND Fellowship Programme of Max Weber Centre for Advanced Cultural and Social Studies at the University of Erfurt for ExperiencedResearchers
MWK-Fellows offers up to 10 fellowships for a duration of 12 months for international postdoctoral scholars whose research is closely related to one of the disciplines and research areas of the Max-Weber-Kolleg Erfurtand who want to participate in its advanced study programme.
The online portal will be open from 1 September to 1 Oktober 2017. 
For further information:

Friday, 1 September 2017

A Conference is taking place on 'Which Theory, Which Practice? Anti-discrimination and Affirmative Action in Educational Contexts'



Eleven years after the General Act on Equal Treatment has been passed and twenty-three years after the modification of the German constitution towards a substantial conception of gender equality, the following questions are still pressing: Who is discriminated by what? Who is equal in which respect and should be a beneficiary of affirmative action? Who is given a public voice and can participate in decision-making?
The conference elaborates on these questions via methodically diverse panels, two keynotes and one round table discussion. Its emphasis is on education broadly understood as encompassing higher education, primary education, social work and political education. Affirmative action measures are considered not only in respect to inequalities of gender and disability. What is at stake is rather an integral approach also addressing disadvantages of class, ethnicity and sexuality and overcoming gender binarism.
Scientists/practitioners/activists will present and discuss theoretical perspectives, recent research, practical reflections as well as experiential narratives. Anti-discrimination and affirmative action measures like, e.g., quotas will be considered from the perspective of different theoretical approaches including intersectionality, queer theory, diversity and a renewed philosophical egalitarianism. At the same time the aim is to explore how practical and experiential knowledge can enrich theory production. The focus will be on education in Thuringia while national as well as global issues, policies and developments will also be taken into account.


Opening Adress (Tuesday, Nov 7th, 6pm):
Birgit Riegraf (Paderborn)

Keynote (Wednesday, Nov 8th, 6pm):
Satish Desphande (Delhi)

Roundtable Discussion on Diversity (Thursday, Nov 9th, 6pm):
Astrid Biele-Mefebue (Göttingen), Petra Köppel (München), Anneliese Niehoff (Bremen), Tove Soiland (Zürich)

Presentations and Workshops:
Annette von Alemann (Paderborn), Oksana Arnold (Erfurt), Mart Busche (Berlin), Ulrike Brands-Proharam Gonzalez (Aachen), Marina Chernivsky (Berlin), Susanne Dern (Fulda), Anette Dietrich (Berlin), Lena Eckert (Weimar), Marcus Felix (Jena), Karim Fereidooni (Bochum), Urmila Goel (Berlin), Joris Anja Gregor (Jena), Jutta Hartmann (Berlin), Sabine Hastedt (Bremerhaven), Marcel Helwig (Jena), Malte Holler (Berlin), Elisabeth Holzleithner (Wien), Mary John (Delhi), Charlotte Kastner (Berlin), Dagmar Keifl (Erfurt), Daniela Keil (Leipzig), Andreas Kemper (Münster), Uta Klein (Kiel), Manfred Köhnen (Berlin), Anike Krämer (Bochum), Silke Martin (Jena), Ev Blaine Matthigack (Berlin), Paul Mecheril (Oldenburg), Maria Katharina Moser (Wien), Hannah Peaceman (Erfurt), Lisa Pfahl (Innsbruck), Monika Platz (München), Katharina Pöllmann-Heller (Regensburg), Tinou Ponzer (Linz), Beate Rössler (Amsterdam), Nathalie Schlenzka (Berlin), Ana Smidt (Bochum), Jennifer Sonntag (Halle), Katrin Springsgut (Frankfurt), Nina Steinweg (Köln), Uli Streib-Brzič (Berlin), Heinz-Jürgen Voss (Merseburg), Juliette Wedl (Braunschweig)

Organising Team: 
Joris Anja Gregor (Jena), Marc Holland-Cunz (Stuttgart), Paula Jaeger (Erfurt), Urs Lindner (Erfurt), Andrea Nachtigall (Jena), Katharina Reinholdt (Erfurt), Cécile Stehrenberger (Braunschweig), Karolin-Sophie Stüber (Jena)

Cooperating Institutions:
University of Erfurt, Max-Weber-Centre, Ernst-Abbe-University of Applied Sciences Jena, Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena, Federal Anti-Discrimination Agency, Thuringian Affirmative Action Network, University Association Erfurt

Sponsors:
University of Erfurt, Federal Anti-Discrimination Agency, Ernst-Abbe-Foundation, Research Group Ordering Dynamics, Thuringian Affirmative Action Network, Max-Weber-Centre, Friedrich-Ebert-Foundation/Thuringia and the Affirmative Action Officer of the State of Thuringia

Contact:
gleichstellungskonferenz2017@uni-erfurt.de


Start: Tuesday, Nov 7th, 4.30pm
End: Friday, Nov 10th, 12.30pm
Venue: Collegium Maius, Michaelisstr. 39, Erfurt

For further information: